We have collected the most relevant information on M Audio Firewire Solo Vs. Open the URLs, which are collected below, and you will find all the info you are interested in.
M-Audio Firewire Solo Vs. M-Audio Firewire 410. Which …
https://gearspace.com/board/low-end-theory/583505-m-audio-firewire-solo-vs-m-audio-firewire-410-one-should-i-get-just-record.html
The m-audio firewire solo, 410 and 1814 were great units in there time but technology and sound quality has improved over the years. I have used them all and they all sound the same, like putting a blanket over the mic.(almost identical parts just different feature sets) These products use 10 year old technology.
M-Audio Firewire Solo vs dedicated DAC? - DAC - Digital to ...
https://audiophilestyle.com/forums/topic/9913-m-audio-firewire-solo-vs-dedicated-dac/
It sounds better than the Mac's output for sure, but it pales in comparison to even the most inexpensive DACs such as Musical Fidelity V-DAC or Cambridge DAC Magic. The TC line of firewire interfaces sound much, much better (Konnekt 24D, Impact Twin, etc.) But I would keep the Firewire Solo as a firewire-to-S/PDIF bridge, and add a decent DAC.
M-Audio Firewire Solo vs Audio Kontrol 1 vs... - Computer ...
https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=156684
Now...I'm kind of a newbie to this sort of thing, but it looks like the Audio Kontrol 1 can do a higher sample rate, has balanced ins/outs (the firewire solo has unbalanced), has a midi in/out, whereas the firewire solo does not. The advantages to the firewire solo is that it has the SPDIF digital in/out and the Audio Kontrol 1 doesn't. Also the Audio Kontrol 1 is USB and the …
M Audio FireWire Solo vs Windows10 - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rac2FDdhpEw
В данном ролике показываю то, что старая M-Audio FireWire Solo, может работать на Windows10.Life канал: https ...
Question: Q: "Line 6 TonePort UX2" vs "M-Audio FireWire ...
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/776603
I would suggest the Firebox over the Solo because of the driverless operation (which is where most people have problems with M-Audio products) and the Presonus preamps may be a tinge better. Dec 20, 2006 6:14 AM in response to Bill H. In response to Bill H. I also would choose the Firebox over the solo.
M-Audio FireWire Solo Review - Sweetwater
https://www.sweetwater.com/insync/m-audio-firewire-solo-review/
The FireWire SOLO provides broad compatibility. If you only need a couple of inputs, whether you record with a simple waveform editor or digital audio workstation, the SOLO is a good choice. It includes driver support for ASIO, WDM, MME, and Apple’s Core Audio. PC or Mac is not an issue as you get compatibility for both platforms.
M-Audio Fast Track or FireWire solo? | MacRumors Forums
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/m-audio-fast-track-or-firewire-solo.249371/
I currently own the Firewire Solo and its main advantage over the Fast Track USB is that it records at 96KHz compared to Fast Track's 48KHz. Given that you already own a XLR mic, I suppose that the quality of your recording matters and that is where the Firewire Solo does better in. If you were to ask me, I'll recommend the Fast Track Pro instead.
Now you know M Audio Firewire Solo Vs
Now that you know M Audio Firewire Solo Vs, we suggest that you familiarize yourself with information on similar questions.
