We have collected the most relevant information on Cambridge Audio Vs Marantz Receiver. Open the URLs, which are collected below, and you will find all the info you are interested in.
Cambridge audio vs Marantz Amp-model by model review ...
https://www.soundboxlab.com/audio-components/amplifier/cambridge-audio-vs-marantz-amp/#:~:text=Difference%20in%20Marantz%20vs%20Cambridge%20audio%20sound%20quality,a%20certain%20warmth%20while%20connected%20to%20this%20amplifier.
Cambridge audio vs Marantz Amp-model by model review ...
https://www.soundboxlab.com/audio-components/amplifier/cambridge-audio-vs-marantz-amp/
Difference in Marantz vs Cambridge audio sound quality shows Marantz PM6006 amplifier delivers better and richer sound. Comparing Marantz PM 6005 vs PM6006, the PM6006 is slightly better and clearer. It has a balanced and smooth sound profile. Music or movies are crispier and has a certain warmth while connected to this amplifier.
Marantz NR1200 vs Cambridge Audio AXR100 AV …
https://www.soundart.org/av-receivers/compare-nr1200-vs-axr100
According to the results of our review, Marantz NR1200 received 6.4 points out of 10 possible, and Cambridge Audio AXR100 was rated 5.6 points. Both AV receivers were introduced in 2019. NR1200 is more performable in terms of audio broadcast than the AXR100. Main advantages Marantz NR1200 over Cambridge Audio AXR100 There is WI-Fi support.
Cambridge Audio CXA81 vs Marantz PM7000N - HQSound101.com
https://hqsound101.com/cambridge-audio-cxa81-vs-marantz-pm7000n/
Cambridge Audio CXA81 vs Marantz PM700N Not everyone needs multiple channels. As long as the amplifier has connectivity, and produces immersive audio, it is all they need to power their entertainment system. The Cambridge Audio CXA81 and the Marantz PM7000N are both two-channel amplifiers that fit discretely into your existing setup.
Marantz vs Cambridge audio - AVS Forum
https://www.avsforum.com/threads/marantz-vs-cambridge-audio.2143962/
Discussion Starter · #1 · Sep 21, 2015. Only show this user. Specs don't say it all? While looking for a worthy upgrade to my $500 Marantz SR5003 stumbled across the Cambridge Audio Azur 551. It's needless to say, the MArantz is a consumer AV. CA on the other hand is said to be 'low end of the high-end".
Cambridge vs Marantz - High-End Audio Discussion Forum
https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/cambridge-vs-marantz
The short version is that to my ears, the Cambridge Audio Dac Magic (CADM) has a crisp tone and tends to widen but flatter the soundstage while creating definition between instruments. The Marantz’s own dac (CADM out of the loop) sounded punchier, particularly drums and bass, with a slightly narrower soundstage but with a bit more 3 dimensionality.
Build quality: Cambridge Audio or Marantz? | Steve …
https://forums.stevehoffman.tv/threads/build-quality-cambridge-audio-or-marantz.1024771/
Build quality: Cambridge Audio or Marantz? Discussion in 'Audio Hardware' started by Speedmaster, Nov 19, 2020. Page 1 of 2 1 2 Next > ... For the heck of it I bought a Cambridge Audio Topaz SR-20 receiver from them about 3 or 4 years ago when they were blowing them out. I mostly bought it to run 2.1 and to see what something new sounded like.
Marantz vs. Cambridge Audio Integrated Amp | Audioholics ...
https://forums.audioholics.com/forums/threads/marantz-vs-cambridge-audio-integrated-amp.76257/
Marantz SR4023 Stereo Receiver w/ phono input - $500. Marantz PM5004 Integrated Amplifier w/ phono input - $450. vs. Cambridge Audio Topaz AM10 Integrated Amp w/ phono input - $350. Cambridge Audio Azur 350A integrated amplifier + phono preamp - $450+. (Bellari VP130 Tube Phono Preamp, Pro-ject Phono Box II, etc.)
Marantz, NAD or Cambridge Audio AVR | AVForums
https://www.avforums.com/threads/marantz-nad-or-cambridge-audio-avr.1804708/
I've auditioned both the current Marantz models (sr5008. 6008 and 7008) as well as NAD (T748, 757, 777) and prefer the NAD sound for music. I've also heard good things about the Cambridge Audio receivers, but haven't managed to find a local dealer that has any of their AVR's for demo. The reason I'm thinking about the Marantz is the additional ...
Marantz PM6007 vs Cambridge Audio AXA35 : …
https://www.reddit.com/r/BudgetAudiophile/comments/p7f81j/marantz_pm6007_vs_cambridge_audio_axa35/
level 1 LosterP · 20d The Marantz is definitely the best option of the two here, particularly if you're going to connect your TV - via an optical cable presumably. The equivalent from Cambridge would be the AXR100, not AXA35, and alternative options include Denon PMA600NE, Rotel A11 Tribute or Yamaha RN602. 2 level 2 ProperRaise Op · 20d
Tough receiver decision - Marantz vs. Yamaha vs. Cambridge ...
https://www.ecoustics.com/electronics/forum/home-audio/17223.html
Perhaps Cambridge Audio report their numbers similar to NAD and HK. As for sound quality - this thing really is a revelation to my limited ear. It creates a sense of airyness and space that both the Yamaha and Marantz failed to deliver - I could barely tell which speakers were playing and which weren't - the sound just seems to be all around ...
Now you know Cambridge Audio Vs Marantz Receiver
Now that you know Cambridge Audio Vs Marantz Receiver, we suggest that you familiarize yourself with information on similar questions.
