We have collected the most relevant information on 488 Not Acceptable Here Audiocodes. Open the URLs, which are collected below, and you will find all the info you are interested in.


AudioCodes => SoundStation IP7000 - SIP/2.0 488 Not ...

    https://community.polycom.com/t5/VoIP-SIP-Phones/AudioCodes-gt-SoundStation-IP7000-SIP-2-0-488-Not-Acceptable/td-p/78904
    Re: AudioCodes => SoundStation IP7000 - SIP/2.0 488 Not Acceptable Here Hello Claus-Ole Olsen, As already replied I only had a brief test scripting this and cannot reproduce this running UC Software 4.0.10 so the next step for you would be to contact your Polycom reseller so they can open a ticket with Polycom support for you.

488 Not Acceptable Here – CLOUD VOICE TECHIESTUFF

    https://loremarcabais.wordpress.com/2017/01/14/488-not-acceptable-here/
    Almost all other numbers are working fine. Diagram below shows where the 488 Not Acceptable Here error comes from. Based on the error, when Optus is sending a valid 180 Ringing to SBC, for some reason the SBC automatically sending “488 Not Acceptable Here” error to ShoreTel thus call is not able to connect successfully.

SIP 488 Unrecognized Transport Profile with Audiocodes and ...

    https://www.mirazon.com/audiocodes-and-lyncskype-for-business-sip-488-unrecognized-transport-profile/
    Audiocodes and Lync/Skype for Business SIP 488 Unrecognized Transport Profile. By Daryl Hunter September 1, 2015 No Comments. Recently, we have been engaging with a customer to unravel their Lync 2013 Enterprise Voice. Over the years, they have had to “work around” several different carrier situations and voice gateways.

SIP call dropped with 488 Not Acceptable Here (No …

    https://support.avaya.com/kb/public/SOLN272631&group=UG_PUBLIC
    If CM receives an INVITE from Voice Portal with SDP having “Media Attribute (a): ptime:5” then CM sends “ 488 Not Acceptable Here (No Matching Codec or Encryption Algo)” response and call drops.

"SIP/2.0 488 Not Acceptable Here" Inbound calls from …

    https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/ie/en-US/691bb5d5-dda0-4c10-af29-c2626ce36651/quotsip20-488-not-acceptable-herequot-inbound-calls-from-pbx-to-lync
    Talk to your provider or reconfigure your gateway/PBX to use only G.711. 488 may also occur if sender IP is not known in topology. What I wanted to say is that the codecs offered in INVITE already contain G.711 ulaw and alaw in addition to G.729, so this cannot be the reason for getting "Not Acceptable Here".

Troubleshoot AudioCodes Configuration Wizard wrong ...

    https://blog.matrixpost.net/troubleshoot-audiocodes-configuration-wizard-wrong-settings-for-dtag-and-teams/
    SIP 488 Not Acceptable Here Often times this is related to codec incompatibilities. For anyone encountering this issue, they should check whether both sides (server and client) have at least one codes they can negotiate.

Teams call transfer failed - Audiocodes VE - Microsoft ...

    https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/microsoft-teams/teams-call-transfer-failed-audiocodes-ve/td-p/1166532
    I have setup an Audiocodes VE Direct Routing SBC, but during the tests I noted that I was not able to forward calls. As I can see, during the REFER process there is a 488 Not Acceptable answer, because of media mismatch between the Mediant and the O365. The p2p calls are working properly in every direction. Have you experienced this kind of problem?

How to fix Error SIP 488 Not Acceptable in Cisco Call ...

    https://www.pbxdom.com/blog/engineering/how-to-fix-error-sip-488-not-acceptable-in-cisco-call-manager
    488 Not Acceptable Here Some aspect of the session description or the Request-URI is not acceptable, or Codec issue. If we want to go to more deep, the IETF rfc3261 explain that message: 488 Not Acceptable Here. The response has the same meaning as 606 (Not Acceptable), but only applies to the specific resource addressed by the Request-URI and the

the sip calls are not routing properly fail with 488 Not ...

    https://support.avaya.com/kb/public/SOLN228172&group=UG_PUBLIC
    “G729A” fall into the encoding name field but it is not defined in RFC 3551, so it is consider as invalid encoding name by CM6.2 SIP stack and this rtpmap attribute with the invalid encoding name is being ignore by CM. Given there is no other audio codec in the “m=” line, the SDP is consider as codec less and CM sent back the 488 Respond.

Solved - Fax Server Issues - 488 Not Acceptable Here | 3CX ...

    https://www.3cx.com/community/threads/fax-server-issues-488-not-acceptable-here.46803/
    OnOfferRejected Recv 488/INVITE from 195.42.6.32:5060 tid=e919f6051052c229 [email protected]: SIP/2.0 488 Not Acceptable Here Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.10:5060;received=214.1.12.22;branch=z9hG4bK-524287-1---e919f6051052c229;rport=5060 To: Anonymous <sip:[email protected]>;tag=4if2x3g0-CC-34 …

Now you know 488 Not Acceptable Here Audiocodes

Now that you know 488 Not Acceptable Here Audiocodes, we suggest that you familiarize yourself with information on similar questions.